Skip to content

Documentation Review - #184

Open
martindale wants to merge 1 commit into
feature/rsifrom
develop
Open

Documentation Review#184
martindale wants to merge 1 commit into
feature/rsifrom
develop

Conversation

@martindale

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Update all documentation and examples.

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

🗂️ Base branches to auto review (1)
  • feature/v0.1.0-RC1

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 996aa623-eedc-4a18-956e-e4a71ee1a613

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • ✅ Review completed - (🔄 Check again to review again)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Security review

Outcome: No medium, high, or critical vulnerabilities identified in this PR.

Scope reviewed: 3fc4b660…69a83e0ff… (docs + Docco example HTML only). No runtime source, dependency, or config changes.

Checks performed:

  • Attacker-controlled sink scan on added/modified HTML (XSS, eval, script injection, unsafe sinks)
  • Secret/credential leakage scan (private keys, mnemonics, tokens, RPC passwords, cookies)
  • Supply-chain / dependency surface (none changed)
  • Prior automation review threads: none present

Static JSDoc/Docco pages and syntax-highlighted example snippets do not introduce an executable attack surface in this change set.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Find vulnerabilities

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.89%. Comparing base (3fc4b66) to head (69a83e0).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           feature/rsi     #184   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        86.89%   86.89%           
============================================
  Files               96       96           
  Lines            34327    34327           
  Branches             1        1           
============================================
  Hits             29827    29827           
  Misses            4500     4500           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant